Summary of LMER showing correlation coefficients of RT, lexical statistics, and word types to RT
All words: . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Formula: RTlog ∼ Condition + Freqlog + Length + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Item) + (WordFreq|Subject) . | ||||
Fixed effects: . | Estimate . | df . | t value . | Pr(>|t|) . |
(Intercept) | −8.66 | 175 | 2,66.918 | <2e−16*** |
Condition = circumfix | 0 | 250 | 0.054 | 0.957 |
Condition = pseudo-infix | −0.02 | 224 | −0.996 | 0.32 |
Condition = infix | 0.06 | 238 | 3.614 | 0.000368*** |
Condition = pseudoredup [+i] | 0.05 | 254 | 1.800 | 0.0731 |
Condition = pseudoredup [−i] | 0.01 | 241 | 0.279 | 0.7807 |
Condition = reduplicate | 0.05 | 247 | 2.163 | 0.0315* |
Length | 0.03 | 259 | 6.805 | 6.99e−11*** |
Word Frequency | −0.02 | 88 | −4.331 | 3.94e−05*** |
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 | ||||
Random effects: . | Variance . | Correlation . | . | . |
Subject | 3.829e−03 | |||
Word Frequency|Subject | 9.685e−05 | 0.54 | ||
Item | 4.758e−03 | |||
Residual | 2.366e−02 |
All words: . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Formula: RTlog ∼ Condition + Freqlog + Length + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Item) + (WordFreq|Subject) . | ||||
Fixed effects: . | Estimate . | df . | t value . | Pr(>|t|) . |
(Intercept) | −8.66 | 175 | 2,66.918 | <2e−16*** |
Condition = circumfix | 0 | 250 | 0.054 | 0.957 |
Condition = pseudo-infix | −0.02 | 224 | −0.996 | 0.32 |
Condition = infix | 0.06 | 238 | 3.614 | 0.000368*** |
Condition = pseudoredup [+i] | 0.05 | 254 | 1.800 | 0.0731 |
Condition = pseudoredup [−i] | 0.01 | 241 | 0.279 | 0.7807 |
Condition = reduplicate | 0.05 | 247 | 2.163 | 0.0315* |
Length | 0.03 | 259 | 6.805 | 6.99e−11*** |
Word Frequency | −0.02 | 88 | −4.331 | 3.94e−05*** |
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 | ||||
Random effects: . | Variance . | Correlation . | . | . |
Subject | 3.829e−03 | |||
Word Frequency|Subject | 9.685e−05 | 0.54 | ||
Item | 4.758e−03 | |||
Residual | 2.366e−02 |
Note. Treatment coding is specified, allowing for a comparison of conditions to the morphologically simple condition. Estimates have been rounded to 2 decimal places. Calculation of p values from t tests and dfs was performed using Satterthwaite’s method in the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova et al., 2017).