Table 2. 

Correlations between global flexibility and resilience scales according to the pipeline used in Long et al. (2019) 

AtlasResilience scales
CD-RISCBRSRS
AAL 90 r = −.14, p = .33 r = −.33, p = .05 r = −.20, p = .23 
Power 264 r = .06, p = .87 r = −.02, p = .87 r = −.03, p = .87 
Schaefer 100 r = −.01, p = .94 r = −.12, p = .58 r = −.16, p = .58 
AtlasResilience scales
CD-RISCBRSRS
AAL 90 r = −.14, p = .33 r = −.33, p = .05 r = −.20, p = .23 
Power 264 r = .06, p = .87 r = −.02, p = .87 r = −.03, p = .87 
Schaefer 100 r = −.01, p = .94 r = −.12, p = .58 r = −.16, p = .58 
View Large
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. No content on this site may be used to train artificial intelligence systems without permission in writing from the MIT Press.
Accept