A content analysis of reasons for Scopus 2020 article titles and abstracts mentioning men but not women (n = 500). The classifications are in the online data supplement (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14720922). Valid percent excludes the last three categories.
Context . | Articles . | Percentage . | Valid percentage . |
---|---|---|---|
Patient case | 150 | 30.0 | 44.8 |
Men who have sex with men | 30 | 6.0 | 9.0 |
Male-specific health issues (other) | 24 | 4.8 | 7.2 |
Testicular and prostate cancer | 22 | 4.4 | 6.6 |
Sport and exercise | 20 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Masculinity, fatherhood | 12 | 2.4 | 3.6 |
Other | 77 | 15.4 | 23.0 |
Women also studied | 103 | 20.6 | |
Sexist language | 53 | 10.6 | |
False match | 9 | 1.8 | |
Total | 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Context . | Articles . | Percentage . | Valid percentage . |
---|---|---|---|
Patient case | 150 | 30.0 | 44.8 |
Men who have sex with men | 30 | 6.0 | 9.0 |
Male-specific health issues (other) | 24 | 4.8 | 7.2 |
Testicular and prostate cancer | 22 | 4.4 | 6.6 |
Sport and exercise | 20 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Masculinity, fatherhood | 12 | 2.4 | 3.6 |
Other | 77 | 15.4 | 23.0 |
Women also studied | 103 | 20.6 | |
Sexist language | 53 | 10.6 | |
False match | 9 | 1.8 | |
Total | 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |