Table 4.

A content analysis of reasons for Scopus 2020 article titles and abstracts mentioning men but not women (n = 500). The classifications are in the online data supplement (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14720922). Valid percent excludes the last three categories.

ContextArticlesPercentageValid percentage
Patient case 150 30.0 44.8 
Men who have sex with men 30 6.0 9.0 
Male-specific health issues (other) 24 4.8 7.2 
Testicular and prostate cancer 22 4.4 6.6 
Sport and exercise 20 4.0 6.0 
Masculinity, fatherhood 12 2.4 3.6 
Other 77 15.4 23.0 
Women also studied 103 20.6   
Sexist language 53 10.6   
False match 1.8   
Total 500 100.0% 100.0% 
ContextArticlesPercentageValid percentage
Patient case 150 30.0 44.8 
Men who have sex with men 30 6.0 9.0 
Male-specific health issues (other) 24 4.8 7.2 
Testicular and prostate cancer 22 4.4 6.6 
Sport and exercise 20 4.0 6.0 
Masculinity, fatherhood 12 2.4 3.6 
Other 77 15.4 23.0 
Women also studied 103 20.6   
Sexist language 53 10.6   
False match 1.8   
Total 500 100.0% 100.0% 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal