Table 2.

Results of Multiple Regression Assessing Predictors of Individual Differences in Science and Math Reasoning Overall, and in Science and Math Counterintuitive Reasoning Specifically, Controlling for Performance in Control Trials

Predictorβtp
DV: Science & Math Acc.
F(4, 29) = 15.20, p < .001, R2 = 63.2%, ΔR2 = 45.4% (vs. model with age only) Age .497 4.67 < .001
g .422 3.67 < .001
Complex no-go acc. .257 2.33 .027
WASI Vocabularya .260 2.21 .035

DV: Science & Math RT
F(2, 31) = 4.95, p = .014, R2 = 19.3%, ΔR2 = 21.8% (vs. model with age only) Age −.117 0.75 .460
g −.487 3.11 .004

DV: Counterintuitive Trials Acc.
F(3,30) = 10.76, p < .001, R2 = 47.0%, ΔR2 = 6.6% (vs. model with age and control acc.) Age .401 2.94 .006
Control trials acc. .344 2.34 .026
WASI Vocabularya .312 2.21 .035

DV: Counterintuitive Trials RT
F(2,31) = 52.08, p < .001, R2 = 75.6% Age .024 0.28 .780
Control trials RT .880 10.18 < .001
Predictorβtp
DV: Science & Math Acc.
F(4, 29) = 15.20, p < .001, R2 = 63.2%, ΔR2 = 45.4% (vs. model with age only) Age .497 4.67 < .001
g .422 3.67 < .001
Complex no-go acc. .257 2.33 .027
WASI Vocabularya .260 2.21 .035

DV: Science & Math RT
F(2, 31) = 4.95, p = .014, R2 = 19.3%, ΔR2 = 21.8% (vs. model with age only) Age −.117 0.75 .460
g −.487 3.11 .004

DV: Counterintuitive Trials Acc.
F(3,30) = 10.76, p < .001, R2 = 47.0%, ΔR2 = 6.6% (vs. model with age and control acc.) Age .401 2.94 .006
Control trials acc. .344 2.34 .026
WASI Vocabularya .312 2.21 .035

DV: Counterintuitive Trials RT
F(2,31) = 52.08, p < .001, R2 = 75.6% Age .024 0.28 .780
Control trials RT .880 10.18 < .001
a

Standardized score.