To examine this possibility, we estimate equation (1) for our core outcomes stratified by whether the female's mother has a college degree. These results, in table 3, show that the role model effects identified in section IVA are driven by daughters of less educated mothers. The results highlight that same-gender role models are important not only for closing the gender STEMM gap but also for closing the within-gender socioeconomic STEMM gap. This suggests same-gender role models may be an important tool for improving intergenerational occupational mobility.24 To ensure that this heterogeneity is not driven by female GPs being better at communicating with low-educated families than male GPs, we also estimate equation (1) for boys of low-educated mothers. The results are provided in table A11. None of the coefficients are statistically significant, consistent with our main findings.
. | High school academic track . | High school STEMM credential . | Compulsory school STEMM GPA . | High school STEMM GPA . |
---|---|---|---|---|
A: Mother college or more | ||||
Same-gender GP | 0.029 | 0.035 | 0.021 | −0.014 |
(0.033) | (0.050) | (0.091) | (0.098) | |
Mean | 0.851 | 0.291 | 4.632 | 4.243 |
Observations | 2,341 | 2,341 | 2,339 | 2,337 |
B: Mother less than college | ||||
Same-gender GP | 0.070*** | 0.093*** | 0.101* | 0.137** |
(0.026) | (0.024) | (0.054) | (0.053) | |
Mean | 0.675 | 0.152 | 4.212 | 3.874 |
Observations | 4,654 | 4,643 | 4,637 | 4,652 |
. | High school academic track . | High school STEMM credential . | Compulsory school STEMM GPA . | High school STEMM GPA . |
---|---|---|---|---|
A: Mother college or more | ||||
Same-gender GP | 0.029 | 0.035 | 0.021 | −0.014 |
(0.033) | (0.050) | (0.091) | (0.098) | |
Mean | 0.851 | 0.291 | 4.632 | 4.243 |
Observations | 2,341 | 2,341 | 2,339 | 2,337 |
B: Mother less than college | ||||
Same-gender GP | 0.070*** | 0.093*** | 0.101* | 0.137** |
(0.026) | (0.024) | (0.054) | (0.053) | |
Mean | 0.675 | 0.152 | 4.212 | 3.874 |
Observations | 4,654 | 4,643 | 4,637 | 4,652 |
The table shows the coefficients obtained through estimation of equation (1) as described in the text and reproduced here for clarity: . is a general term denoting the outcome listed at the top of each column, and each estimation includes municipality (), year of swap (), birth year (), and previous GP () fixed effects. The point estimates depicted in the table should be interpreted as the effect of random assignment to same-gender GP in childhood on the outcome listed at the top of the column. Standard errors are clustered at the level of the exogenously assigned GP. Panel A includes all girls who were subject to at least one exogenous GP swap prior to age 15 and have a mother with at least a college education. Panel B includes includes all girls who were subject to at least one exogenous GP swap before age 15 and have a mother with less than a college education. Significant at 10%, 5%, 1%.