Output of Region of Practical Equivalence (ROPE) Analysis, Which Computes the Proportion of the Posterior Distribution That Lies Inside a Null Region
| Outcome Variable . | Age . | Gender . | Order . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which ones had someone in charge? | ROPE: 0.35%* | ROPE: 22.56% | ROPE: 21.85% |
| Est: 0.45 | Est: −0.01 | Est: −0.04 | |
| CI: 0.19 to 0.72 | CI: −0.70 to 0.68 | CI: −0.73 to 0.65 | |
| Who do you think shares more with one another? | ROPE: 0.58%* | ROPE: 22.57% | ROPE: 1.87%* |
| Est: 0.41 | Est: 0.08 | Est: −0.77 | |
| CI: 0.17 to 0.66 | CI: −0.58 to 0.74 | CI: 0.35 to −1.46 | |
| Would you rather be a Wug or a Flurp? | ROPE: 2.72% | ROPE: 22.44% | ROPE: 14.58% |
| Est: −0.32 | Est: 0.13 | Est: −0.33 | |
| CI: −0.56 to −0.10 | CI: −0.56 to −0.10 | CI: −0.96 to 0.30 | |
| Who would you rather go camping with? | ROPE: 1.10%* | ROPE: 8.54% | ROPE: 7.52% |
| Est: −0.37 | Est: −0.48 | Est: −0.51 | |
| CI: 0.12 to −0.61 | CI: 0.33 to −1.13 | CI: 0.33 to −1.15 |
| Outcome Variable . | Age . | Gender . | Order . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which ones had someone in charge? | ROPE: 0.35%* | ROPE: 22.56% | ROPE: 21.85% |
| Est: 0.45 | Est: −0.01 | Est: −0.04 | |
| CI: 0.19 to 0.72 | CI: −0.70 to 0.68 | CI: −0.73 to 0.65 | |
| Who do you think shares more with one another? | ROPE: 0.58%* | ROPE: 22.57% | ROPE: 1.87%* |
| Est: 0.41 | Est: 0.08 | Est: −0.77 | |
| CI: 0.17 to 0.66 | CI: −0.58 to 0.74 | CI: 0.35 to −1.46 | |
| Would you rather be a Wug or a Flurp? | ROPE: 2.72% | ROPE: 22.44% | ROPE: 14.58% |
| Est: −0.32 | Est: 0.13 | Est: −0.33 | |
| CI: −0.56 to −0.10 | CI: −0.56 to −0.10 | CI: −0.96 to 0.30 | |
| Who would you rather go camping with? | ROPE: 1.10%* | ROPE: 8.54% | ROPE: 7.52% |
| Est: −0.37 | Est: −0.48 | Est: −0.51 | |
| CI: 0.12 to −0.61 | CI: 0.33 to −1.13 | CI: 0.33 to −1.15 |
Note. We defined that region as going from −.1 to .1. We preregistered this analysis after realizing that our original analysis approach was flawed, therefore we had run other analyses on this data before this analysis was carried out. We preregistered that we would consider outcomes of 2.5% or lower to be evidence for the alternative hypothesis that the factor had an effect (Makowski et al., 2019), marked with an * in the table. CI = confidence interval; Est = estimate.