Performance of all adaptation methods on NER in the fine setting. Recall that the fine adaptation method categories we evaluate are loss augmentation (LA), pseudo-labeling (PL), pretraining (PT), and instance weighting (IW).
| . | i2b22006 . | . | i2b22014 . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM . | P . | R . | F1 . | . | P . | R . | F1 . |
| ZS | 12.6 | 14.1 | 13.3 | 24.0 | 28.3 | 25.9 | |
| LA | 16.1 | 15.8 | 16.0 | 22.8 | 25.7 | 24.2 | |
| PL | 17.5 | 11.4 | 13.8 | 39.5 | 21.4 | 27.7 | |
| PT | 10.0 | 12.3 | 11.1 | 17.1 | 22.3 | 19.4 | |
| IW | 14.4 | 14.1 | 14.2 | 21.8 | 25.6 | 23.6 | |
| . | i2b22006 . | . | i2b22014 . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM . | P . | R . | F1 . | . | P . | R . | F1 . |
| ZS | 12.6 | 14.1 | 13.3 | 24.0 | 28.3 | 25.9 | |
| LA | 16.1 | 15.8 | 16.0 | 22.8 | 25.7 | 24.2 | |
| PL | 17.5 | 11.4 | 13.8 | 39.5 | 21.4 | 27.7 | |
| PT | 10.0 | 12.3 | 11.1 | 17.1 | 22.3 | 19.4 | |
| IW | 14.4 | 14.1 | 14.2 | 21.8 | 25.6 | 23.6 | |