Table 7: 

Hierarchical MT-AL results. We report best average F1 results over all five datasets for the best β configuration per method.

NERNER BestRERE Best
MT-R 81.96 0/5 52.47 05 
MT-AVG (β = 1.0) 82.64 1/5 59.51 2/5 
MT-RRF (β = 0.8) 82.69 1/5 59.65 1/5 
MT-IND (β = 1.0) 82.86 2/5 60.15 0/5 
MT-PAR (β = 0.7) 82.68 1/5 59.57 2/5 
NERNER BestRERE Best
MT-R 81.96 0/5 52.47 05 
MT-AVG (β = 1.0) 82.64 1/5 59.51 2/5 
MT-RRF (β = 0.8) 82.69 1/5 59.65 1/5 
MT-IND (β = 1.0) 82.86 2/5 60.15 0/5 
MT-PAR (β = 0.7) 82.68 1/5 59.57 2/5 
View Large
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. No content on this site may be used to train artificial intelligence systems without permission in writing from the MIT Press.
Accept