Regression Analysis Of Algerian Bridegrooms’ Status on Type of Migrant and Controls, Algiers, Bône, Constantine, and Oran, 1870–1872 and 1910–1912 (Unstandardized Coefficients, Multiple Imputation, N = 3,172)
| . | b . | p . |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 19.62 | 0.00 |
| Type of migrant: | ||
| Non-migrants (ref.) | ||
| From France (1.5 generation) | 3.55 | 0.00 |
| From France (first generation) | 3.64 | 0.00 |
| From elsewhere (1.5 generation) | −2.82 | 0.00 |
| From elsewhere (first generation) | −2.40 | 0.01 |
| Controls: | ||
| Father’s status | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Age | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| Signature | 6.55 | 0.00 |
| Place of marriage: | ||
| Algiers (ref.) | ||
| Constantine | −0.45 | 0.46 |
| Oran | 0.12 | 0.84 |
| Bône | −0.51 | 0.44 |
| Period: | ||
| 1870–1872 (ref.) | ||
| 1910–1912 | 0.11 | 0.83 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.25–0.26* | |
| . | b . | p . |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 19.62 | 0.00 |
| Type of migrant: | ||
| Non-migrants (ref.) | ||
| From France (1.5 generation) | 3.55 | 0.00 |
| From France (first generation) | 3.64 | 0.00 |
| From elsewhere (1.5 generation) | −2.82 | 0.00 |
| From elsewhere (first generation) | −2.40 | 0.01 |
| Controls: | ||
| Father’s status | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Age | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| Signature | 6.55 | 0.00 |
| Place of marriage: | ||
| Algiers (ref.) | ||
| Constantine | −0.45 | 0.46 |
| Oran | 0.12 | 0.84 |
| Bône | −0.51 | 0.44 |
| Period: | ||
| 1870–1872 (ref.) | ||
| 1910–1912 | 0.11 | 0.83 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.25–0.26* | |
Slightly different between the twenty imputed data sets.
note For interpretation of the effects: one standard deviation of father’s status is 10.5 (see Table 3).