Regression Analysis of Algerian and French Bridegrooms’ Status on Type of Migrant and Controls, 1870–1872 and 1910–1912 (Unstandardized Coefficients, Multiple Imputation; N = 4,524)
. | b . | p . |
---|---|---|
Intercept | 19.14 | 0.00 |
Type of migrant: | ||
Non-migrants in Algeria | 0.70 | 0.31 |
From France to Algeria (1.5 generation) | 4.38 | 0.00 |
From France to Algeria (first generation) | 4.52 | 0.00 |
Internal migrants in France | −0.57 | 0.43 |
Non-migrants in France (ref.) | ||
From elsewhere to Algeria (1.5 generation) | −1.90 | 0.03 |
From elsewhere to Algeria (first generation) | −1.50 | 0.13 |
Controls: | ||
Father’s status | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Age | 0.16 | 0.00 |
Signature | 6.68 | 0.00 |
Period: | ||
1870–1872 (ref.) | ||
1910–1912 | 0.29 | 0.48 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.22–0.23* |
. | b . | p . |
---|---|---|
Intercept | 19.14 | 0.00 |
Type of migrant: | ||
Non-migrants in Algeria | 0.70 | 0.31 |
From France to Algeria (1.5 generation) | 4.38 | 0.00 |
From France to Algeria (first generation) | 4.52 | 0.00 |
Internal migrants in France | −0.57 | 0.43 |
Non-migrants in France (ref.) | ||
From elsewhere to Algeria (1.5 generation) | −1.90 | 0.03 |
From elsewhere to Algeria (first generation) | −1.50 | 0.13 |
Controls: | ||
Father’s status | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Age | 0.16 | 0.00 |
Signature | 6.68 | 0.00 |
Period: | ||
1870–1872 (ref.) | ||
1910–1912 | 0.29 | 0.48 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.22–0.23* |
Slightly different between the twenty imputed data sets.
note French bridegrooms from cities only.