Skip to Main Content
Table 6

Predicted results with respect to the control group for each test pairing if Sibilant Harmony and First-Last Assimilation grammars were internalized

ConditionsPairs
FL/*SH vs. *FL/*SH (e.g., [s . . . ∫ . . . s] vs. [s . . . s . . . ∫]) FL/SH vs. *FL/*SH (e.g., [s . . . s . . . s] vs. [s . . . s . . . ∫]) FL/SH vs. FL/*SH (e.g., [s . . . s . . . s] vs. [s . . . ∫ . . . s]) 
Rate of FL/*SH Rate of FL/SH Rate of FL/SH 
SH ∼Control > Control > Control 
FL > Control > Control ∼ Control 
ConditionsPairs
FL/*SH vs. *FL/*SH (e.g., [s . . . ∫ . . . s] vs. [s . . . s . . . ∫]) FL/SH vs. *FL/*SH (e.g., [s . . . s . . . s] vs. [s . . . s . . . ∫]) FL/SH vs. FL/*SH (e.g., [s . . . s . . . s] vs. [s . . . ∫ . . . s]) 
Rate of FL/*SH Rate of FL/SH Rate of FL/SH 
SH ∼Control > Control > Control 
FL > Control > Control ∼ Control 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal