Table 3.

Analyses of two-quantifier sentences

Within-configuration (E-U → E-U, U-E → U-E)
Omnibus analysis
PredictorCoefficientSEWald Zp-value
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 6.51, p = .010, LL= −528
Intercept 0.66 0.33 2.00 .045
Probe 1.06 0.33 3.18 .0015
Interpretation 0.66 0.20 3.26 .0011
Simple effects
E-U only
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 6.79, p = .0092, LL = −258
Intercept 1.71 0.39 4.33 <.001
Interpretation 1.16 0.29 4.04 <.001
U-E only
Best-fitting model did not include prime interpretation, χ2(1) < 1
Intercept 0.91 0.40 2.28 .020
Interpretation 0.14 0.29 0.50 .62
Between-configuration (E-U → U-E, E-U → U-E)
Omnibus analysis
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 11.97, p < .001, LL = −518
Intercept 0.98 0.34 2.93 .0035
Probe 0.64 0.26 2.44 .015
Interpretation 0.88 0.19 4.56 <.001
Simple effects
E-U → U-E
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 5.38, p = .020, LL= −252
Intercept 1.52 0.32 4.79 <.001
Interpretation 0.93 0.27 3.41 <.001
U-E → E-U
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 9.38, p = .0022, LL = −298
Intercept 0.85 0.32 2.67 .0077
Interpretation 1.03 0.26 3.98 <.001
Within-configuration (E-U → E-U, U-E → U-E)
Omnibus analysis
PredictorCoefficientSEWald Zp-value
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 6.51, p = .010, LL= −528
Intercept 0.66 0.33 2.00 .045
Probe 1.06 0.33 3.18 .0015
Interpretation 0.66 0.20 3.26 .0011
Simple effects
E-U only
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 6.79, p = .0092, LL = −258
Intercept 1.71 0.39 4.33 <.001
Interpretation 1.16 0.29 4.04 <.001
U-E only
Best-fitting model did not include prime interpretation, χ2(1) < 1
Intercept 0.91 0.40 2.28 .020
Interpretation 0.14 0.29 0.50 .62
Between-configuration (E-U → U-E, E-U → U-E)
Omnibus analysis
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 11.97, p < .001, LL = −518
Intercept 0.98 0.34 2.93 .0035
Probe 0.64 0.26 2.44 .015
Interpretation 0.88 0.19 4.56 <.001
Simple effects
E-U → U-E
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 5.38, p = .020, LL= −252
Intercept 1.52 0.32 4.79 <.001
Interpretation 0.93 0.27 3.41 <.001
U-E → E-U
Best-fitting model included prime interpretation, χ2(1) = 9.38, p = .0022, LL = −298
Intercept 0.85 0.32 2.67 .0077
Interpretation 1.03 0.26 3.98 <.001
Close Modal