Figure 4:
Illustration of the tensor decomposition equations. Order-3 tensors Y∈RI1×I2×I3 are shown here as examples. (a) Block term decomposition (BTD) for P terms of Kronecker tensor products of Ap (weights) and Xp (tensorface patterns) (see equation 2.7), where ⊗ is the Kronecker product and P is the number of tensorfaces in the decomposition. In general, the algorithm allows tensor size for each term P to be set individually, as shown in the diagram, but in practice, all were set the same size. (b) Rank-constrained BTD decomposition illustrated for a single term. Ap and Xp can each be expressed as a set of matrices Um and V(l) (indicated by small rectangles) (see equations 2.8 and 2.9). Setting the number of columns for those matrices equal to the desired rank values, Sp and Rp, respectively, imposes the rank constraints of the decomposition. Rank of the Xp decomposition determines tensorface complexity. Rank of the Ap decomposition was always 1.

Illustration of the tensor decomposition equations. Order-3 tensors YRI1×I2×I3 are shown here as examples. (a) Block term decomposition (BTD) for P terms of Kronecker tensor products of Ap (weights) and Xp (tensorface patterns) (see equation 2.7), where is the Kronecker product and P is the number of tensorfaces in the decomposition. In general, the algorithm allows tensor size for each term P to be set individually, as shown in the diagram, but in practice, all were set the same size. (b) Rank-constrained BTD decomposition illustrated for a single term. Ap and Xp can each be expressed as a set of matrices Um and V(l) (indicated by small rectangles) (see equations 2.8 and 2.9). Setting the number of columns for those matrices equal to the desired rank values, Sp and Rp, respectively, imposes the rank constraints of the decomposition. Rank of the Xp decomposition determines tensorface complexity. Rank of the Ap decomposition was always 1.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal