Figure 9:
While the reconstruction is better for w'=0.01 (lower MSE), the prior and posterior activity of the middle layer are significantly more different than for w'=0.25, and the prior activity in particular seems to be constant. Here, we take a closer look at the activity of the w'=0.25 and w'=0.01 models presented in Figure 8. Here, we consider only the part happening during the time window [1200]. Only the y dimension of the 2D patterns is illustrated in the first row of the graphs; however, the MSE (second row) is computed for both dimensions. The two bottom rows show the mean μt(q) (posterior) and μt(p) (prior) of the middle layer.

While the reconstruction is better for w'=0.01 (lower MSE), the prior and posterior activity of the middle layer are significantly more different than for w'=0.25, and the prior activity in particular seems to be constant. Here, we take a closer look at the activity of the w'=0.25 and w'=0.01 models presented in Figure 8. Here, we consider only the part happening during the time window [1200]. Only the y dimension of the 2D patterns is illustrated in the first row of the graphs; however, the MSE (second row) is computed for both dimensions. The two bottom rows show the mean μt(q) (posterior) and μt(p) (prior) of the middle layer.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal