Figure 10:
Experimental prediction 1. (A) Schematic of the task for the case of a gaussian belief. The distributions of yt+1 under the prior belief π(0) and the current belief π(t) are shown by black and red curves, respectively. Two possible observations with equal absolute prediction error δ but opposite sign bias s are indicated by dashed lines. The two observations are equally probable under π(t) but not under π(0). SBF is computed as the ratio between the red and black dots for a given observation, whereas SSh is a function of the weighted sum of the two. This phenomenon is the basis of our experimental prediction. (B) The average surprise values S¯Sh(θ^=1,δ,s=±1,σC=0.5) and S¯BF(θ^=1,δ,s=±1,σC=0.5) over 20 subjects (each with 500 observations) are shown for two different learning algorithms (Nas12* and pf20). The mean S¯BF is higher for negative sign bias (marked in blue) than for positive sign bias (marked in orange). The opposite is observed for the mean S¯Sh. This effect increases with increasing values of prediction error δ. The shaded area corresponds to the standard error of the mean. The experimental task is the same as the gaussian task we used in the previous section, with σ=0.5 and pc=0.1 (see section 4 for details).

Experimental prediction 1. (A) Schematic of the task for the case of a gaussian belief. The distributions of yt+1 under the prior belief π(0) and the current belief π(t) are shown by black and red curves, respectively. Two possible observations with equal absolute prediction error δ but opposite sign bias s are indicated by dashed lines. The two observations are equally probable under π(t) but not under π(0). SBF is computed as the ratio between the red and black dots for a given observation, whereas SSh is a function of the weighted sum of the two. This phenomenon is the basis of our experimental prediction. (B) The average surprise values S¯Sh(θ^=1,δ,s=±1,σC=0.5) and S¯BF(θ^=1,δ,s=±1,σC=0.5) over 20 subjects (each with 500 observations) are shown for two different learning algorithms (Nas12* and pf20). The mean S¯BF is higher for negative sign bias (marked in blue) than for positive sign bias (marked in orange). The opposite is observed for the mean S¯Sh. This effect increases with increasing values of prediction error δ. The shaded area corresponds to the standard error of the mean. The experimental task is the same as the gaussian task we used in the previous section, with σ=0.5 and pc=0.1 (see section 4 for details).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal