Figure 6: 
Graphical representation of the first value in the definition of score, for the case q = ℱ, assuming c(i) = P≥(j) = ℓ and ai further has children bℓ +1 and bℓ +2. Because q = ℱ, there was some other node bℓ′ in the
                        same component that was shifted on to the stack earlier and given a
                        (non-gold) parent; let us assume ℓ′ = ℓ − 1. We can add 3 children to the
                        score, but should subtract Δ(c(i) = P ≥ (j) ∧ q ≠ 𝒩) = 1, to compensate for the fact
                        that edge
                            (bℓ,bℓ−1)
                        cannot be constructed, as bℓ−1 can only
                        have one parent. If we further assume ai has a parent among
                        the critical nodes, then that parent must be in a different component, and
                        therefore τ (i, j, q) = 𝒩.

Graphical representation of the first value in the definition of score, for the case q = ℱ, assuming c(i) = P(j) = and ai further has children b +1 and b +2. Because q = ℱ, there was some other node bℓ′ in the same component that was shifted on to the stack earlier and given a (non-gold) parent; let us assume ℓ′ = − 1. We can add 3 children to the score, but should subtract Δ(c(i) = P ≥ (j) ∧ q ≠ 𝒩) = 1, to compensate for the fact that edge (b,b−1) cannot be constructed, as b−1 can only have one parent. If we further assume ai has a parent among the critical nodes, then that parent must be in a different component, and therefore τ (i, j, q) = 𝒩.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal