Figure 10:
Simulation results of the synaptic weight change induced by a 1 second train of
              spikes with different degrees of correlation as a function of the frequency . The fraction p of
              correlated spikes takes the values 0, , and
              1 in these plots. The delay between pre- and postsynaptic spikes was taken to be  in these simulations. The case  corresponds to the dashed lines in Figures 8 and 9.
              (a) The pairwise hippocampal parameters, equation 3.1, were used, together with , , and , corresponding to the triplet fit. (b) Here
              the pairwise cortical parameters, equation 4.1, were used, together with , , and ,
              corresponding to the triplet fit.

Simulation results of the synaptic weight change induced by a 1 second train of spikes with different degrees of correlation as a function of the frequency . The fraction p of correlated spikes takes the values 0, , and 1 in these plots. The delay between pre- and postsynaptic spikes was taken to be in these simulations. The case corresponds to the dashed lines in Figures 8 and 9. (a) The pairwise hippocampal parameters, equation 3.1, were used, together with , , and , corresponding to the triplet fit. (b) Here the pairwise cortical parameters, equation 4.1, were used, together with , , and , corresponding to the triplet fit.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal